City Los Angeles blocks public release of Mayor Karen Bass’s discrimination complaint file

LOS ANGELES.

Question to Hi Point 1522 LLC and Power Property Management Inc., c/o Los Angeles City Clerk. To Thomas Khammar and Benjamin Renkainen. Thomas Khammar wrote in part Feb. 11, 2026. “With regard to the parking, the owner is agreeable to renting you an extra (tandem) parking space at the rate of $150.00 per month. If you desire to purchase same, we will ensure your parking spaces (both of them) are the closest spaces available to your unit. However, the provision of an extra parking space for free presents again as an undue financial burden, and thus the building owner is not required to provide same.” I have already replied at length to that letter, but I want to add more. First, the way things work is that my request has to be viewed by you as reasonable. Reasonable means also that you, not me, will incur the costs of the accommodation. If you claim financial burden, then you are also not agreeing that the accommodation request is reasonable. Not sure you understand that. Thus you have discriminated against me since the Feb. 11, 2026 letter. Second, as of this date, five months have passed (seven months since you first mentioned the alleged $150 for parking), and you have not provided to me —or the Public, since it is the Public you are advertising to through your business empire—of your alleged financial burden. Third, as regards financial hardship, there are currently parking for 27 vehicles. As far as I know (unless you are charging HUD and section 8 for parking), there are no (zero) tenants paying a fee for parking, and parking is included in the rent paid. There is also no advertisement online stating there is a fee for parking. As a tenant, and as a member of the Public, you have refused to verify such information to me. You even have ads on AffordableHousing.com and come company called “Community” and they are not verifying a parking fee. Wow! It is a big secret. You have alleged there is a separate application for parking, but no application has materialized since you made the claim in December 2025, barring any secret documents you turned over to corrupt city employee Thomas Scott or corrupt Mayor Karen Bass. There is no separate parking application, and there never was. But for sure, tenants’ units 1, 3, 7, 13, 4 , do not own a car, so there is no loss of money there because I assume you are not charging them $150 if they do not have a car. Included in that figure of five tenants is that stalls (non-corresponding) 1, 4, 5, 10, 13, 14, 15, and half of 17, are stalls where there is no car. So 13, 14, 15 are two car stalls, so that is seven vacant stalls or parking for eleven vehicles. So I assume even if they are used as “guest” stalls (a fact you have not denied), you are not charging or collecting any money for those stalls. And if you are not making money off eleven parking stalls, and not charging anyone, it is not believable that you want to claim financial hardship. Even Thomas Scott should be able to see this (employee of the City DOD department). Maybe you can explain why I was singled out for unfair treatment, being that I am the only one asked to pay the $150, not including the fact you have not given me a reduction since I SHARE a “no-cost” parking stall 8 with my roommate. Maybe you, Thomas Scott, or the City Housing Department can answer my concerns. (EXCERPT).