Letter to Judge David O. Carter

May 7 2025

1522 Hi Point Street 9
Los Angeles. CA. 90035
323-( )



Via First Class and Priority Mail


“This is another example where the city government intentionally acts against the health, safety, and welfare of tenants. An intercom system is a necessity”

Judge David O. Carter
Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse
411 West Fourth Street,
Courtroom 10 A
Santa Ana, CA, 92701-4516

Hi Point 1522 LLC
C/O Power Property Management Inc.
8885 Venice Blvd Suite 205
Los Angeles, CA. 90034

Mayor Karen Bass and City Council
City Hall
Los Angeles, California 90012

Re: Denial of housing services to Black tenants, such services claimed to
be only entitled to those who are paying luxury rents

The city code enforcement sent an inspector out Tuesday May 6, 2025
about 1:45 pm and this shall be a memorialization of that inspection of this
property at 1522 S. Hi Point St 90035.

  1. The inspector Mark Bridge said he did not have copies of the two
    recent complaints I filed with code enforcement, numbered 932473
    and 934688. He asked me to explain the issues. He said the
    department does not give the inspectors copies of the complaint.
  2. I have complained to housing and code enforcement about the need
    for entitlement to tandem parking. This was not addressed by the
    inspector. My research is that the code enforcement has authority over
    the entire property including the parking lot and spaces. The filing of a
    code violation complaint gives the inspector authority to inspect. He
    made no diligent inspection of the tandem parking part of my
    complaint.
  3. I reported debris at the back of the building two doors laying up
    against the building but not attached to the building. The
    inspector admitted the doors are debris but said he would not site the
    owner because it is not a substantial amount of debris . My opinion is
    that since the doors are standing up against the building, they
    represent a health and safety hazard because unattached they could
    fall and injure someone. To that extent I disagree with the inspector.
    I reported a hole in the outer wall of building near the laundry room.
    Looks like some piping was repaired but they left a gaping hall in the
    wall. The inspector said he will site the owner for that and took a
    picture.
  4. I did provide a full copy of the code violation complaints to the owner
    and resident manager prior to the city inspection.
  5. I reported that the hot water boiler or water tank every two months or
    so stops working and we then have no hot water. The inspector said I
    would have to call that in when it happens.
  6. I reported a water leak from the kitchen ceiling. I cannot tell if it is
    coming from the tenant above or from rain water. The inspector took a
    picture of the kitchen cabinet and said he will site the owner for repairs
    and he will follow up return in 45 days.
  7. I reported an abandoned vehicle with expired registration and flat tire
    in numbered parking stall #4. I told him the car has been there for
    months not moving. He took a picture of the car.
  8. I reported the non-working intercom in my unit as well as the non-
    working intercom at the front of the building. The intercom system was
    authorized by the city certificate of occupancy dated 1973. The city
    also requires a permit for installation of the motor for the intercom
    system. “In Los Angeles, an electrical permit is generally required for
    any new or altered electrical work, including the installation or
    replacement of an intercom system’s motor.” (Source: Google). A code
    violation complaint gives the city authority to investigate the intercom
    system.
  9. A recent Judge in a petition for writ case ruled that the
    intercom is a housing service. (Case 23STCP00644 Los Angeles
    Superior Court Johnson vs City of Los Angeles.) Thousands of
    buildings across the city have some type of intercom system,
    especially multi-family dwellings.The city LAMC section states that the
    intercom “including but not limited to” is a housing service. The
    inspector said he would not address the non working intercom
    because the City has determined the intercom is a luxury, not a
    necessity. I disagreed.
  10. I will be filing another complaint over the non-working intercom and
    denial of tandem parking.
  11. An intercom is for purposes of communication, security and the health,
    safety and welfare of tenants. This is another example where the city
    government intentionally acts against the health, safety, and welfare of
    tenants. An intercom system is a necessity. There is no city regulation
    that says the intercom system is a “luxury” or that the city has any
    authority to deny tenant repairs of such. The inspector on behalf of
    Mayor Karen Bass is implying that only those paying luxury rent
    amounts are entitled to a working intercom; this is a discriminatory
    practice by city government officials. The inspector’s position was that
    as Black tenants, we are not enticed to a working intercom or full and
    equal housing services, parts to use the Akuxox system.
  12. My rent agreement does not say that the Intercom in my unit is a
    luxury.
  13. I reported to the inspector that while the bathroom sink had recently
    been resurfaced, the contractors from Power Property Management
    failed to follow lead-safe repair practices. The inspector attempted to
    minimize the damages that had occurred to my health and safety. He
    said that my only recourse would be to ask the owner to do something
    about it, but he never gave me any opportunity to have the City further
    investigate the owners practices. I showed the inspector pictures of
    the apartment while the sink resurfacing was being done that showed
    that it was not being done properly. From my experiences, tenants
    cannot depend on the city of Los Angeles government to protect them
    from health, safety, and security hazards. The property owner did not
    adhere to required containment and cleaning procedures. I told the
    inspector there was white dust over everything in my apartment, as a
    result of the repairs, including the floor and fixtures. I had asked the
    owner (and copied the city employees) that I be relocated during
    repairs but the owner did not respond. The inspector did not indicate
    that he was going to cite the owner for this improper practice. By copy
    to the owner of the property, I request that the owner incur the expense of vacuuming and shampooing my carpet for the unsafe lead contaminated dust that was left behind by the contractors, all rights
    reserved to claim additional damages.

    Reference:
    “Housing services are services that are connected with the use or
    occupancy of a rental unit including, but not limited to, utilities (including
    light, heat, water and telephone), ordinary repairs or replacement, and
    maintenance including painting. The term also includes the provision of
    elevator service, laundry facilities and privileges, common recreational
    facilities, janitor service, resident manager, refuse removal, furnishings,
    food service, parking and any other benefits, privileges or facilities. (LAMC
    Sec. 151.02, Definition of Housing Services).”

    The code enforcement inspector Mark Bridge, under the authority of
    Mayor Karen Bass, has denied myself and my roommate, the entitlement
    to housing services that are stated in the LA municipal code section
    above.

    Sincerely,
    Geary J. Johnson

1522 Hi Point St 9

Los Angeles. CA.  90035

323-( )

Wednesday, December 4, 2024

Honorable David O. Carter

District Judge

Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse
411 West Fourth Street,
Courtroom 10 A
Santa Ana, CA, 92701-4516

[LA alliance for human rights et al. at all v. City of Los Angeles et. al CASE 2:20-cv-02291 DOC (KESx)

Dear Judge and possible parties in housing related cases:

I am not a party to any lawsuits at this time that might be before you. I am not involved in any litigation. However I write as a concerned citizen —-friend of the court so to speak—-and as a tenant living in city of Los Angeles.

I bring to your attention a court case (petition for writ) that was filed in Superior Court Los Angeles. I attach a copy of one transcript from a court hearing. 23STCP00644 GEARY J. JOHNSON VS LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT, ET AL.

In short synopsis, this case involved requesting the court to rule on the city housing decision to not grant a reduction in rent due to reduction in housing services. The case concerned a rent controlled property. The City, property owner, and Court basically took the position that services not spelled out in the written rent agreement were not an entitlement to the tenant. IMO housing includes housing services. Los Angeles city law does not mandate that services have to be spelled out in the rent agreement to be housing services. State law specifies that only lease agreement for one year or more must be in writing. Rental agreements of less that one year, as in the attached case, do not have to be in writing. Nevertheless, this case examined a rental agreement where a tenant was entitled to repairs and parking, yet the city, property owner, and I believe court felt the tenant was not entitled to parking or repairs. The local LAMC quoted below does not say services have to be in the written rent agreement.

I read with interest your cases over the years on housing. Affordable income restricted is one thing while rent controlled housing is another. We need more rent controlled housing. But we also need a city government (I note the Mayor’s Karen Bass office and CD 5 have been specifically informed of this) that recognizes tenants are entitled to full and equal housing services (state law Unruh Act), and that tenants are entitled to protection of housing services recognized by the conduct of the parties, as recognized under state law cases.

It seems incongruous for the Court to crusade for more housing—-which is needed—- while Los Angeles city officials fight against providing housing services. Intercoms and parking are valued housing services across the County.

Sincerely,

Geary J. Johnson

RAC 410.04

Housing Services Defined

“Housing services are services that are connected with the use or occupancy of a rental unit including, but not limited to, utilities (including light, heat, water and telephone), ordinary repairs or replacement, and maintenance including painting. The term also includes the provision of elevator service, laundry facilities and privileges, common recreational facilities, janitor service, resident manager, refuse removal, furnishings, food service, parking and any other benefits, privileges or facilities. (LAMC Sec. 151.02, Definition of Housing Services).”