Is the landlord responsible for the accessible parking, the accessible intercom, and the accessible door entry peephole?

The content highlights a tenant’s disputes with property owner Thomas Khammar, regarding required accommodations such as accessible peepholes, parking stalls, and intercom systems, which the tenant argues should not incur extra costs. The tenant claims Khammar’s demands constitute harassment and illegal rent increases, citing an absence of related provisions in their rental agreement. Continue reading